imo i hate them, im not just being homophobic or racist either.
their way of life is wrong. end of story. if it was the correct way they could produce offspring and keep this world running.. but they cant and that sould tell them something
wut do you guys think? <br>
i agree! <br>
My Car Sucks
I think that whatever they want to do is cool. They are humans, just like you and me. They have all of the desires, wants, and free will that being human provides. Why should they be with a female or male (gay or lesbian) just to reproduce. I would imagine that being raised in a loveless household would be pretty damaging to the child. So how is that doing the right thing? By screwing up a child...
Stick with who you love, whether it be male or female. I personally am in a relationship where I love the person I'm with. I wish everyone could be allowed to experience that joy freely.
Get over it
If you have a problem with people being happy and content, then keep your hate and fear to yourself. It will not change anyones life, it will make people dislike you, and you may be missing out on many wonderful friendships. It's sad that you would limit yourself that way.
Besides, with there being so many stupid people in this world, it's not going to hurt to have a few not producing offspring. Let's not spread the stupidity
<br>
1: You assume that because it's popular, Heterosexuality is right
2: You assume you are not equally wrong
3. You assume that heterosexual people are popping off babies left and right are doing the 'correct thing' and looking after their kids.
4. You forget about living and let live.
You're not racist, you're closed minded. I pity you greatly.
Once Sizzy is off the Ban, I'm sure she'll have something to say.
<br>
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
I really doubt it is a choice, it only makes sense that people are born gay or straight.
If it was a choice why would they choose gay and have to put up with all the ignorant
comments and harassment from biggot idiots?
<br>
I'd be more worried about when Sizzy gets off ban for her to get back on ban for her reply to this...
Besdies, i'm wondering how dirty elf got to be the one who made the descsions about who's right and who's wrong... <br>
Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
Don't judge lest ye be judged, but everybody is entitled to their own opinion.
<br>
Opining is fine, but if you don't think about it first, I KNOW there will a good 5-6 people (at least after me) that will rip your opinion to threads if you are thought disabled.
You do still have the civil right to wrong.
<br>
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
um ... 
You claim your not homophobic and yet you question there way of life ?
A true ( non-homophobic ) wouldn't have even gave this a second thought,
let alone make an issue out of it .
<IMG SRC=http://www.j-body.org/registry/eztrip/personal_pic.jpg>
ive known a few gay guys in my life. cool people actually. the way i look at it, as long as your happy with your mate, so be it. i just find it really sad and pathetic that the US government is trying to ban gay marriage. there is more important things to spend money and time on than that <br>
Im a Xbox 360 fanboy...and damn proud of it!!
If someone wants to be gay, then that's ine by me. As long as they don't do anything to me sexually, or show affection in front of me then I'm cool with it. It just freaks me out to watch that kind of stuff or to have some guy try and come hit on me.
<br>
Yella02-I promise I will return to you in one piece and this will stay up until I am safely home
/\ yeah i agree. i feel the same way. <br>
<img src="http://registry.gmenthusiast.com/images/upstatenyz24/borat2.jpg">
I'm not against gays, I don't go around taking their lunch money, but I don't agree with their lifestyle. I don't agree that they should be able to adopt, i don't agree they should be able to get married.
I'm not gonna sit their and call gays a sinner because I am a sinner myself. But i choose to repent from my sins, they do not. <br>
Sponsored by -
A Plus Performance &
Redrum Customs
"The tire fell off...it fell off...it fell the fuk off!"
Saint:
That's cool.. most gay men won't come on to you if you make it known that you're straight and not interested. If a guy comes on to you and doesn't quit it:
a: take it as a compliment, you're pretty when they're drunk
b: know that billions of women have been in the same place you are, and you have good company.
Live and let live. <br>
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
What's a worse sin, splurgin? Two gay parents that adopt a baby and give it the love, attention, good home, and consideration that a child needs, or two hewterosexual parents that abuse (sexually, mentally, or physically) and neglect their child--as is a considerable portion of the "god fearing" WASP population.
What's worse as well? Two gay peiople in love getting maried and staying like that forever, or a pure heretosexual population with a 66% divorce rate?
Personally, i think that the people siding with the moral right have to seek to heal the damage that the "moral right" has done to itself rather than try an impose their belief structure on others when a considerable portion of those people can't follow it themselves.
Oh, and Saint, please clarify on "public affection", if you will, because my take is this: Any display of blatant public affection that i find acceoptable for straights i find acceptble for gays. I.E. they can hold hands, hug, kiss, etc. Not like give a tonsil-massage or serious groping, ya know.
Anyhow, my $.02 <br>
Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
[quote=Keeper of the Light™]What's a worse sin, splurgin? Two gay parents that adopt a baby and give it the love, attention, good home, and consideration that a child needs, or two hewterosexual parents that abuse (sexually, mentally, or physically) and neglect their child--as is a considerable portion of the "god fearing" WASP population.
What's worse as well? Two gay peiople in love getting maried and staying like that forever, or a pure heretosexual population with a 66% divorce rate?
Personally, i think that the people siding with the moral right have to seek to heal the damage that the "moral right" has done to itself rather than try an impose their belief structure on others when a considerable portion of those people can't follow it themselves.
Oh, and Saint, please clarify on "public affection", if you will, because my take is this: Any display of blatant public affection that i find acceoptable for straights i find acceptble for gays. I.E. they can hold hands, hug, kiss, etc. Not like give a tonsil-massage or serious groping, ya know.
Anyhow, my $.02
will add to keepers $.02 & make it $.04
what he said!
-------
Your (as in anyone else's) sex life does not matter to me. I don't not care what occurs between consenting adults. My child will not be privy to any information on his parents sexual conduct... why the hell would a gay couple be any different? Most kids just want healthy, happy parents and do not care, nor want to know, about their parents sex lives. I always wonder why complete strangers would be concerned.
Millions of children do not have any family to speak of. Seriously, a certain "moral right" deciding that these children should rather remain family-less rather than live in a loving, caring home is just beyond me.
Maybe each and every person of the opinion that gay couples shouldn't be allowed to adopt should HAVE to adopt a child in need of a family. Then those children could have a "normal" upbringing. "Normal" probably including an imperfect family with divorced parents and custody disputes. There is no such thing as "perfect" or "normal". These kids just want a home.
Would be nice to see the straight "perfect & normal" couples looking to adopt actually going beyond the "we need a bouncing baby boy/girl" philosophy.
I suppose that those on the "moral right" are more concerned about the sex lives of others over the bigger issue of children growing up parent-less. That should be the bigger moral issue, if you ask me.
As to public displays of affection... When it's time to get a room, it's time to get a room. Regardless of whether it's a straight or gay couple. Regular everyday affection should not bother anyone. Should mind your own business. Noone is making anyone watch them. Look away then. duh
<br>
-fina ^.,.^@~
Proud mommy to joshua
Splurgin wrote:I'm not against gays, I don't go around taking their lunch money, but I don't agree with their lifestyle. I don't agree that they should be able to adopt, i don't agree they should be able to get married.
I'm not gonna sit their and call gays a sinner because I am a sinner myself. But i choose to repent from my sins, they do not.
I'm not picking on you specifically, but I hear this rot all the time.
1, I'm sure that your lifestyle rubs some environmentalist the wrong way... you're going to piss someone off just by breathing, how much do you think you give a damn? Well ask a gay man or woman, you and your myopic opinion means less than @!#$ to them.
2, Gay people that adopt usually have a stable relationship, good income, and are a lot more patient than many heterosexual adoptive couples. It's not by their intrinsic gayness that they are this way, but they are ready to commit to a stable relationship, and carry on with kids... How is that so awful? Really, I want to hear a valid argument on this because a lot of bigots and "I don't hate"-ers haven't presented one that will stand up to scrutiny nor are the exclusive domain of hetero sexuals other than reproduction...
3, Something that I've modified my stand on is that Marriage is a sacrament of the church, and as such, no church should be forced to perform a marriage it doesn't want to... However, I think that if it stands for homosexuals, it should stand for heterosexuals as well, KOTL said it was 66% of hetero marriages end in divorce... I've read 50-55%.. either way, it's pretty piss-poor if you ask me. Marriage is merely a religious term for pair bonding (barring pluralisation, but this isn't the time or place to discuss the hypocrisy of the Religious right). So, basically, keep marriage the domain of heterosexuals, and let homosexuals have Civil Unions, and protect and reward both equally, or neither at all.
Basically, if you want to live under the fallacy that everyone in the world is equal, you have to accept that some people are different, but have the same rights and should be afforded equal protections under the government and it's laws. If you think that merely because they choose or are driven to sleep with their own sex that they deserve lesser protections, I suppose the term "slippery slope" applies enough to disintegrate racial, religious and gender protections.
In this case, you don't HAVE to like them... you must accept them as people... if not, you're breathing MY air... STOP THAT!
<br>
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal
(*), that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
(*) --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
(*) Unles I don't like you or your beliefs, lifestyle, color, gender, car, yada yada ya.........so too bad P.S. God hates you too you are going to hell.
some of you may recognize this little document, some won't.
personally as far as gay/homosexual goes, BFD, don't care. i don't partake myself and don't intend to, if another man is hitting on me i tell them straight up i am not into men. if it happens a second time then it will be more assertive, especially if they are drinking, a third time is not tolerated because it has now become harassment that although not detrimental is taking up my time for some BS.
<br>
Ya know, if we still held that document seriously, this current government would be out on it's arse a long time ago. <br>
Goodbye Callisto & Skađi, Hello Ishara:
2022 Kia Stinger GT2 AWD
The only thing every single person from every single walk of life on earth can truly say
they have in common is that their country is run by a bunch of fargin iceholes.
if everyone was gay the world would end, cuz nobody would reproduce anymore...so how can being gay be right???
People are not born gay...gays are just screwed up people who want attention, and statistics show lotsa gay males have bad realtionships w/ their father...thus seeking the male companionship...thats all it is <br>
THIS FLOWER GOT THORNS
mikey: I have screwed up relationship with my father, I want attention, and I'm screwed up, but I'm not gay.
Your hyper-moronic ideal of everyone being gay is not only foolish but pointless... of course there will be aberrations in the species... I mean... look at yourself.
Now seriously, People are born as albino, with cleft pallets, Negroid, Mongoloid, Caucazoid and all stripes inbetween... saying that a person is weird because they're Gay is saying that someone else is weird because they're white.
You can't choose what you are. Eeef you are a heeeppo, you juss accept you arrre zee heeppo, and bee happie. (from Along Came Polly)
<br>
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
oh yeah then why do guys have penises and girls have vaginas and they fit togather?????
by accident??
of course some ppl CHOOSE to be gay that doesn't make it right ppl CHOOSE to do a lot of things wrong...being gay is one of em <br>
THIS FLOWER GOT THORNS
mikey likey; from your profile you seem to be a hotbed of intellectual activity, i am interested in your line of reason, maybe a demonstration of this choice you speak aboot.
I got it, go get a gun and shoot yourself in the face, larger caliber the better.
anywho, i guess it can be true to an extent that some choose to be gay, however small the percentage that is, but to say they all did is like saying all mikey's are @!#$ imbeciles. <br>
